Bookbot

Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Debating the Gay Ban in the Military

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 200 stron
  • 7 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

Conservatives and liberals agree that President Bill Clinton's effort to lift the military's gay ban was perhaps one of the greatest blunders of his tenure in office. Conservatives argue that Clinton should have left well enough alone; liberals believe that he should have ordered the military to accept homosexuals rather than agreeing to the compromise "don't ask, don't tell" policy. In this ground-breaking book, experts of both persuasions come together to debate the critical aspects of the gays-in-the-military issue. The participants consider whether homosexuals undermine military performance; whether they threaten heterosexual privacy; and whether the experiences of militaries in other countries have relevance for the United States. They also explore the human, organizational, and dollar costs of the present policy. Belkin and Bateman provide a thorough context for the transcripts of the deliberations, as well as a discussion of the implications of the participants' conclusions for current U.S. policy.

Zakup książki

Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Debating the Gay Ban in the Military, Aaron Belkin, Geoffrey Bateman

Język
Rok wydania
2003
Oprawa
(miękka)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

5,0
Doskonała
2 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Debating the Gay Ban in the Military
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
2003
Oprawa
miękka
Liczba stron
200
ISBN10
1588261468
ISBN13
9781588261465
Seria
Ocena
5 z 5
Opis
Conservatives and liberals agree that President Bill Clinton's effort to lift the military's gay ban was perhaps one of the greatest blunders of his tenure in office. Conservatives argue that Clinton should have left well enough alone; liberals believe that he should have ordered the military to accept homosexuals rather than agreeing to the compromise "don't ask, don't tell" policy. In this ground-breaking book, experts of both persuasions come together to debate the critical aspects of the gays-in-the-military issue. The participants consider whether homosexuals undermine military performance; whether they threaten heterosexual privacy; and whether the experiences of militaries in other countries have relevance for the United States. They also explore the human, organizational, and dollar costs of the present policy. Belkin and Bateman provide a thorough context for the transcripts of the deliberations, as well as a discussion of the implications of the participants' conclusions for current U.S. policy.