Bookbot

Political Philosophy versus History?

Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 240 stron
  • 9 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

Is the way in which political philosophy is conducted today too ahistorical? Does such ahistoricism render political philosophy too abstract? Is political philosophy thus incapable of dealing with the realities of political life? This volume brings together some of the world's leading political philosophers to address these crucial questions. The contributors focus especially on political philosophy's pretensions to universality and on its strained relationship with the world of real politics. Some chapters argue that political philosophers should not be cowed by the accusations levied against them from outside of their own field. Others insist that these accusations require a dramatic reshaping of normative political thought. The volume will spark controversy across political philosophy and beyond.

Zakup książki

Political Philosophy versus History?, Jonathan Floyd, Marc Stears

Język
Rok wydania
2011
Oprawa
(miękka)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

3,4
Dobra
3 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Political Philosophy versus History?
Podtytuł
Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
2011
Oprawa
miękka
Liczba stron
240
ISBN10
0521146887
ISBN13
9780521146883
Seria
Ocena
3,35 z 5
Opis
Is the way in which political philosophy is conducted today too ahistorical? Does such ahistoricism render political philosophy too abstract? Is political philosophy thus incapable of dealing with the realities of political life? This volume brings together some of the world's leading political philosophers to address these crucial questions. The contributors focus especially on political philosophy's pretensions to universality and on its strained relationship with the world of real politics. Some chapters argue that political philosophers should not be cowed by the accusations levied against them from outside of their own field. Others insist that these accusations require a dramatic reshaping of normative political thought. The volume will spark controversy across political philosophy and beyond.