Bookbot

Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99

Autorzy

  • kolektiv

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 425 stron
  • 15 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”

Zakup książki

Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99, kolektiv

Język
Rok wydania
1999
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

5,0
Doskonała
1 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Volume 99
Język
angielski
Autorzy
kolektiv
Rok wydania
1999
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
425
ISBN10
0674379470
ISBN13
9780674379473
Seria
Ocena
5 z 5
Opis
Volume 99 of Harvard Studies in Classical Philology includes the following Nancy Felson, “Vicarious Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four”; Douglas E. Gerber, “Pindar, Nemean A Commentary”; Jennifer Clarke Kosak, “Therapeutic Touch and Sophokles’ Philoktetes ”; F. S. Naiden, “The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus”; Thomas A. Schmitz, “‘I Hate All Common Things’: The Reader’s Role in Callimachus’ Aetia Prologue”; Dimitrios Yatromanolakis, “Alexandrian Sappho Revisited”; John T. Ramsey, “Mithridates, the Banner of Ch’ih-yu, and the Comet Coin”; Alexander Jones, “Geminus and the Isia”; Benjamin Victor, “Further Remarks on the Andria of Terence”; Peter E. Knox, “Lucretius on the Narrow Road”; Francis Cairns, “Virgil Eclogue 1.1–2: A Literary Programme?”; Michael Hendry, “ Epidaurus, Epirus,…Epidamnus? Vergil Georgics 3.44”; Charles Segal, “Ovid’s Meleager and the Trials of Gender and Genre”; John Hunt, “Readings in Apollonius of Tyre ”; Bernard Frischer et al., “Word-Order Transference between Latin and The Relative Position of the Accusative Direct Object and the Governing Verb in Cassius Dio and Other Greek and Roman Prose Authors”; and Craig Kallendorf, “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship.”