Bookbot

Informal Logic

A Handbook for Critical Argumentation

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 310 stron
  • 11 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

This is an introductory guide to the basic principles of constructing good arguments and criticizing bad ones. It is nontechnical in its approach, and is based on 150 key examples, each discussed and evaluated in clear, illustrative detail. The author explains how errors, fallacies, and other key failures of argument occur. He shows how correct uses of argument are based on sound argument strategies for reasoned persuasion and critical questions for responding. Among the many subjects covered are: techniques of posing, replying to, and criticizing questions, forms of valid argument, relevance, appeals to emotion, personal attack, uses and abuses of expert opinion, problems in deploying statistics, loaded terms, equivocation, and arguments from analogy.

Zakup książki

Informal Logic, Douglas N. Walton

Język
Rok wydania
1989
Oprawa
(miękka)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

4,1
Bardzo dobra
94 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Informal Logic
Podtytuł
A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
1989
Oprawa
miękka
Liczba stron
310
ISBN10
0521379253
ISBN13
9780521379250
Seria
Ocena
4,05 z 5
Opis
This is an introductory guide to the basic principles of constructing good arguments and criticizing bad ones. It is nontechnical in its approach, and is based on 150 key examples, each discussed and evaluated in clear, illustrative detail. The author explains how errors, fallacies, and other key failures of argument occur. He shows how correct uses of argument are based on sound argument strategies for reasoned persuasion and critical questions for responding. Among the many subjects covered are: techniques of posing, replying to, and criticizing questions, forms of valid argument, relevance, appeals to emotion, personal attack, uses and abuses of expert opinion, problems in deploying statistics, loaded terms, equivocation, and arguments from analogy.