Bookbot

The Content and Context of Hate Speech

Rethinking Regulation and Responses

Ocena książki

Więcej o książce

The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories, and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical settings justify different substantive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression. Essays address the following questions, among others: Is hate speech in fact so dangerous or harmful to vulnerable minorities or communities as to justify a lower standard of constitutional protection? What harms and benefits accrue from laws that criminalize hate speech in particular contexts? Are there circumstances in which everyone would agree that hate speech should be criminally punished? What lessons can be learned from international case law?

Zakup książki

The Content and Context of Hate Speech, Michael Herz, Peter Molnár

Język
Rok wydania
2012
Oprawa
(miękka)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

4,0
Bardzo dobra
4 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
The Content and Context of Hate Speech
Podtytuł
Rethinking Regulation and Responses
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
2012
Oprawa
miękka
Liczba stron
570
ISBN10
0521138361
ISBN13
9780521138369
Seria
Ocena
4 z 5
Opis
The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories, and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical settings justify different substantive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression. Essays address the following questions, among others: Is hate speech in fact so dangerous or harmful to vulnerable minorities or communities as to justify a lower standard of constitutional protection? What harms and benefits accrue from laws that criminalize hate speech in particular contexts? Are there circumstances in which everyone would agree that hate speech should be criminally punished? What lessons can be learned from international case law?