Bookbot

The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning

Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans and Planners

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 458 stron
  • 17 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

In this revealing history, Henry Mintzberg, a prominent figure in management thought, critiques the concept of strategic planning, which has captivated organizations since 1965. He argues that the term is an oxymoron, as strategy involves synthesis while planning focuses on analysis, leading to frequent failures in the process. Mintzberg explores the origins and evolution of strategic planning, highlighting its rise and subsequent decline. He advocates for a reimagined approach to strategy creation that prioritizes informal learning and personal vision, redefining the roles of planners. By examining various strategic planning models, he uncovers reasons for their failures and discusses the pitfalls of planning, such as its tendency to undermine commitment, limit vision, stifle change, and foster political environments. Mintzberg identifies three fundamental fallacies: the belief that discontinuities can be predicted, that strategists can remain detached from operations, and that strategy-making can be formalized. He emphasizes a new role for planners, suggesting they should support the strategy-making process rather than be embedded within it, contributing inputs and fostering strategic thinking. This work is essential for anyone involved in organizational planning or strategy-making.

Zakup książki

The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Henry Mintzberg

Język
Rok wydania
1994
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

3,9
Bardzo dobra
172 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning
Podtytuł
Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans and Planners
Język
angielski
Wydawca
Free Press
Rok wydania
1994
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
458
ISBN10
0029216052
ISBN13
9780029216057
Seria
Ocena
3,9 z 5
Opis
In this revealing history, Henry Mintzberg, a prominent figure in management thought, critiques the concept of strategic planning, which has captivated organizations since 1965. He argues that the term is an oxymoron, as strategy involves synthesis while planning focuses on analysis, leading to frequent failures in the process. Mintzberg explores the origins and evolution of strategic planning, highlighting its rise and subsequent decline. He advocates for a reimagined approach to strategy creation that prioritizes informal learning and personal vision, redefining the roles of planners. By examining various strategic planning models, he uncovers reasons for their failures and discusses the pitfalls of planning, such as its tendency to undermine commitment, limit vision, stifle change, and foster political environments. Mintzberg identifies three fundamental fallacies: the belief that discontinuities can be predicted, that strategists can remain detached from operations, and that strategy-making can be formalized. He emphasizes a new role for planners, suggesting they should support the strategy-making process rather than be embedded within it, contributing inputs and fostering strategic thinking. This work is essential for anyone involved in organizational planning or strategy-making.