Bookbot

Controversies: Ethics and Interdisciplinarity - 16: Controversies and Interdisciplinarity

Beyond Disciplinary Fragmentation for a New Knowledge Model

Parametry

  • 279 stron
  • 10 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

Nowadays, the forms assumed by knowledge indicate an unhinging of traditional structures conceived on the model of discipline. Consequently, what was once strictly disciplinary becomes interdisciplinary, what was homogeneous becomes heterogeneous and what was hierarchical becomes heterarchical. When we look for a matrix of interdisciplinarity, that is to say, a primary basis or an essential dimension of all the complex phenomena we are surrounded by, we see the need to break with the disciplinary self-restraint in which, often completely inadvertently, many of us lock ourselves up, remaining anchored to our own competences, ignoring what goes beyond our own sphere of reference. However, interdisciplinarity is still a vague concept and a much demanding practice. It presupposes the continuous search for convergent theoretical perspectives and methodologies, and the definition of common spaces and languages, as well as a true dialogical and open mind of several scholars. From ethics to science, from communication to medicine, from climate change to human evolution the volume Controversies and Interdisciplinarity offers a series of original insights beyond disciplinary fragmentation for a new knowledge model.

Zakup książki

Controversies: Ethics and Interdisciplinarity - 16: Controversies and Interdisciplinarity, Jens S. Allwood, Giovanni Scarafile, Clara Renna, Olga Pombo

Język
Rok wydania
2020
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

Nikt jeszcze nie ocenił.Oceń

Tytuł
Controversies: Ethics and Interdisciplinarity - 16: Controversies and Interdisciplinarity
Podtytuł
Beyond Disciplinary Fragmentation for a New Knowledge Model
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
2020
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
279
ISBN10
9027207542
ISBN13
9789027207548
Seria
Tagi
Opis
Nowadays, the forms assumed by knowledge indicate an unhinging of traditional structures conceived on the model of discipline. Consequently, what was once strictly disciplinary becomes interdisciplinary, what was homogeneous becomes heterogeneous and what was hierarchical becomes heterarchical. When we look for a matrix of interdisciplinarity, that is to say, a primary basis or an essential dimension of all the complex phenomena we are surrounded by, we see the need to break with the disciplinary self-restraint in which, often completely inadvertently, many of us lock ourselves up, remaining anchored to our own competences, ignoring what goes beyond our own sphere of reference. However, interdisciplinarity is still a vague concept and a much demanding practice. It presupposes the continuous search for convergent theoretical perspectives and methodologies, and the definition of common spaces and languages, as well as a true dialogical and open mind of several scholars. From ethics to science, from communication to medicine, from climate change to human evolution the volume Controversies and Interdisciplinarity offers a series of original insights beyond disciplinary fragmentation for a new knowledge model.