Bookbot

Basic Bioethics: What Genes Can't Do

Autorzy

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 228 stron
  • 8 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

The idea of the gene has been a central organizing theme of 20th-century biology, and the Human Genome Project and biotechnological advances have put the gene in the media spotlight. In this text Lenny Moss reviews the history that led to the gene-centered approach of contemporary biology. He offers a critique of this approach and suggests an alternative to it. He also attempts to bring rhetorical analysis back into a productive encounter with empirical science. Moss identifies two distinctly different uses of the concept of the gene, Gene-P and Gene-D-genes as instrumental predictors of phenotypes and genes as developmental resources that specify possible amino acid sequences in proteins. The popular idea that genes provide the blueprints for organisms, claims Moss, arose from the incorrect conflation of these independently valid meanings of the gene.

Zakup książki

Basic Bioethics: What Genes Can't Do, Lenny Moss

Język
Rok wydania
2002
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

3,0
Dobra
1 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Basic Bioethics: What Genes Can't Do
Język
angielski
Autorzy
Lenny Moss
Wydawca
MIT Press
Rok wydania
2002
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
228
ISBN10
026213411X
ISBN13
9780262134118
Ocena
3 z 5
Opis
The idea of the gene has been a central organizing theme of 20th-century biology, and the Human Genome Project and biotechnological advances have put the gene in the media spotlight. In this text Lenny Moss reviews the history that led to the gene-centered approach of contemporary biology. He offers a critique of this approach and suggests an alternative to it. He also attempts to bring rhetorical analysis back into a productive encounter with empirical science. Moss identifies two distinctly different uses of the concept of the gene, Gene-P and Gene-D-genes as instrumental predictors of phenotypes and genes as developmental resources that specify possible amino acid sequences in proteins. The popular idea that genes provide the blueprints for organisms, claims Moss, arose from the incorrect conflation of these independently valid meanings of the gene.