Bookbot

Sammlung Wissenschaft und Gegenwart: Vladimir Solov'ev und Max Scheler

Parametry

  • 468 stron
  • 17 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

This comparative study examines the works of Vladimir Solovyev and Max Scheler, highlighting areas of direct relation between their thoughts. The author emphasizes that the similarities are not due to any factual influence of Solovyev on Scheler. Instead, the significant parallels in their spiritual and philosophical development are explored, particularly in the chapter on systematic philosophy. This comparison serves a purpose beyond historical interest; it aims to foster better understanding between Eastern and Western philosophies. By establishing a common area of inquiry, the author lays the groundwork for future discussions and demonstrates a convergence of viewpoints on key problems. Additionally, the author considers how the ideas of Solovyev and Scheler may contribute to an emerging consciousness in the Soviet Union, one that critically addresses misrepresentations of both non-Marxist Russian philosophy and Western philosophy as a whole. Regarding the translation, it is important to note the challenge of distinguishing between the German terms "Sein" and "Seiendes," with "being" typically referring to "Seiendes." Lastly, the abbreviations for the works of Solovyev and Scheler used in the footnotes are clarified in the summary found on page 31.

Zakup książki

Sammlung Wissenschaft und Gegenwart: Vladimir Solov'ev und Max Scheler, Helmut Dahm

Język
Rok wydania
1971
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

Nikt jeszcze nie ocenił.Oceń

Tytuł
Sammlung Wissenschaft und Gegenwart: Vladimir Solov'ev und Max Scheler
Język
niemiecki
Wydawca
Pustet
Rok wydania
1971
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
468
ISBN10
3791601008
ISBN13
9783791601007
Seria
Opis
This comparative study examines the works of Vladimir Solovyev and Max Scheler, highlighting areas of direct relation between their thoughts. The author emphasizes that the similarities are not due to any factual influence of Solovyev on Scheler. Instead, the significant parallels in their spiritual and philosophical development are explored, particularly in the chapter on systematic philosophy. This comparison serves a purpose beyond historical interest; it aims to foster better understanding between Eastern and Western philosophies. By establishing a common area of inquiry, the author lays the groundwork for future discussions and demonstrates a convergence of viewpoints on key problems. Additionally, the author considers how the ideas of Solovyev and Scheler may contribute to an emerging consciousness in the Soviet Union, one that critically addresses misrepresentations of both non-Marxist Russian philosophy and Western philosophy as a whole. Regarding the translation, it is important to note the challenge of distinguishing between the German terms "Sein" and "Seiendes," with "being" typically referring to "Seiendes." Lastly, the abbreviations for the works of Solovyev and Scheler used in the footnotes are clarified in the summary found on page 31.