Bookbot

Taking Economics Seriously

Autorzy

Parametry

  • 87 stron
  • 4 godziny czytania

Więcej o książce

A leading economist explores how our economic arrangements could improve by applying basic principles without ideological blinders. Dean Baker argues that while economics itself is sound, economists often neglect their own principles in policy discussions. He questions what policy would look like if mainstream economic principles were applied consistently. For instance, in the regulation debate, Baker—who predicted the 2008 financial meltdown—highlights that the concept of a “free market” is a myth, as modern markets are heavily regulated. Intrusive regulations, such as copyright and patents, are often overlooked as regulatory devices. Recognizing the extent of regulation opens up more options for policy design and determining beneficiaries. In health care reform, Baker points out that economists frequently disregard the principle of marginal cost pricing. Medical services are priced significantly higher than production costs, a discrepancy rarely addressed in reform discussions. He suggests that applying marginal cost pricing could lead to competitive wages for doctors and lower prices for prescription drugs and medical tests. This exploration offers an alternative perspective on economic principles, encouraging a return to basics to address the most pressing issues in our economy.

Zakup książki

Taking Economics Seriously, Dean Baker

Język
Rok wydania
2010
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

Nikt jeszcze nie ocenił.Oceń

Tytuł
Taking Economics Seriously
Język
angielski
Autorzy
Dean Baker
Wydawca
MIT PR
Rok wydania
2010
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
87
ISBN10
0262014181
ISBN13
9780262014182
Seria
Opis
A leading economist explores how our economic arrangements could improve by applying basic principles without ideological blinders. Dean Baker argues that while economics itself is sound, economists often neglect their own principles in policy discussions. He questions what policy would look like if mainstream economic principles were applied consistently. For instance, in the regulation debate, Baker—who predicted the 2008 financial meltdown—highlights that the concept of a “free market” is a myth, as modern markets are heavily regulated. Intrusive regulations, such as copyright and patents, are often overlooked as regulatory devices. Recognizing the extent of regulation opens up more options for policy design and determining beneficiaries. In health care reform, Baker points out that economists frequently disregard the principle of marginal cost pricing. Medical services are priced significantly higher than production costs, a discrepancy rarely addressed in reform discussions. He suggests that applying marginal cost pricing could lead to competitive wages for doctors and lower prices for prescription drugs and medical tests. This exploration offers an alternative perspective on economic principles, encouraging a return to basics to address the most pressing issues in our economy.