Bookbot

Lost in Math

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 291 stron
  • 11 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

A contrarian argues that modern physicists' obsession with beauty has given us wonderful math but bad science Whether pondering black holes or predicting discoveries at CERN, physicists believe the best theories are beautiful, natural, and elegant, and this standard separates popular theories from disposable ones. This is why, Sabine Hossenfelder argues, we have not seen a major breakthrough in the foundations of physics for more than four decades. The belief in beauty has become so dogmatic that it now conflicts with scientific objectivity: observation has been unable to confirm mindboggling theories, like supersymmetry or grand unification, invented by physicists based on aesthetic criteria. Worse, these "too good to not be true" theories are actually untestable and they have left the field in a cul-de-sac. To escape, physicists must rethink their methods. Only by embracing reality as it is can science discover the truth.

Zakup książki

Lost in Math, Sabine Hossenfelder

Język
Rok wydania
2018
Oprawa
(twarda)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

4,1
Bardzo dobra
2518 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Lost in Math
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
2018
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
291
ISBN10
0465094252
ISBN13
9780465094257
Seria
Ocena
4,05 z 5
Opis
A contrarian argues that modern physicists' obsession with beauty has given us wonderful math but bad science Whether pondering black holes or predicting discoveries at CERN, physicists believe the best theories are beautiful, natural, and elegant, and this standard separates popular theories from disposable ones. This is why, Sabine Hossenfelder argues, we have not seen a major breakthrough in the foundations of physics for more than four decades. The belief in beauty has become so dogmatic that it now conflicts with scientific objectivity: observation has been unable to confirm mindboggling theories, like supersymmetry or grand unification, invented by physicists based on aesthetic criteria. Worse, these "too good to not be true" theories are actually untestable and they have left the field in a cul-de-sac. To escape, physicists must rethink their methods. Only by embracing reality as it is can science discover the truth.