Bookbot

Traité d'athéologie

physique de la métaphysique

Ocena książki

Parametry

  • 282 strony
  • 10 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

Not since Nietzsche has a work so groundbreaking and explosive appeared, to question the role of the world's three major monotheistic religions. If Nietzsche proclaimed the death of God, French philosopher Michel Onfray starts from the premise that not only is God still very much alive but increasingly controlled by fundamentalists who pose a danger to the human race. Documenting the ravages from religious intolerance over the centuries, Onfray makes a strong case against the three religions for their obsession with purity and their contempt for reason and intelligence, individual freedom, desire and the human body, sexuality and pleasure, and for women in general. In their place, all three demand faith and belief, obedience and submission, extol the "next life" to the detriment of the here and now. Tightly argued, this is a work that is sure to stir debate on the role of religion in Australian society--and politics.

Zakup książki

Traité d'athéologie, Michel Onfray

Język
Rok wydania
2005
Oprawa
(miękka)
Jak tylko się pojawi, wyślemy Ci wiadomość e-mail.

Metody płatności

3,8
Bardzo dobra
231 Ocena

Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.

Tytuł
Traité d'athéologie
Podtytuł
physique de la métaphysique
Język
francuski
Wydawca
Grasset
Rok wydania
2005
Oprawa
miękka
Liczba stron
282
ISBN10
2246648017
ISBN13
9782246648017
Seria
Oryginalna nazwa
Traité d'athéologie
Ocena
3,75 z 5
Opis
Not since Nietzsche has a work so groundbreaking and explosive appeared, to question the role of the world's three major monotheistic religions. If Nietzsche proclaimed the death of God, French philosopher Michel Onfray starts from the premise that not only is God still very much alive but increasingly controlled by fundamentalists who pose a danger to the human race. Documenting the ravages from religious intolerance over the centuries, Onfray makes a strong case against the three religions for their obsession with purity and their contempt for reason and intelligence, individual freedom, desire and the human body, sexuality and pleasure, and for women in general. In their place, all three demand faith and belief, obedience and submission, extol the "next life" to the detriment of the here and now. Tightly argued, this is a work that is sure to stir debate on the role of religion in Australian society--and politics.