Więcej o książce
Based on the Tanner lectures delivered by Justice Stephen Breyer at Harvard in November 2004, this book defines “active liberty” as the sharing of sovereign authority between the nation and its citizens. Breyer views the Constitution not as a rigid legal framework but as a living guide that adapts to a changing society. He emphasizes that the Constitution's true genius lies in its principles' ability to address contemporary issues rather than adhering to a static interpretation. Through examples in free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Breyer argues that courts should recognize the Constitution’s democratic nature when interpreting texts. He asserts that citizens must engage in community life to gain the experience needed for self-governance. Breyer's unique perspective in the federalism debate posits that deference to congressional power can enhance democratic participation. He contends that, despite its imperfections, Congress has effectively balanced diverse citizen views, especially during crises, better than the executive or judicial branches. With a nuanced understanding of complexity, Breyer advocates for Congress as the appropriate forum for resolving policy disputes, making a significant declaration about democracy and governance.
Wydanie
Zakup książki
Active Liberty, Stephen Breyer
- Język
- Rok wydania
- 2005
- Oprawa
- (twarda),
- Stan książki
- Dobry
- Cena
- 51,99 zł
Metody płatności
Brakuje nam tutaj Twojej recenzji.
- Tytuł
- Active Liberty
- Podtytuł
- Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution
- Język
- angielski
- Autorzy
- Stephen Breyer
- Wydawca
- Knopf
- Rok wydania
- 2005
- Oprawa
- twarda
- Liczba stron
- 176
- ISBN10
- 0307263134
- ISBN13
- 9780307263131
- Seria
- Kategorie
- Ocena
- 3,5 z 5
- Opis
- Based on the Tanner lectures delivered by Justice Stephen Breyer at Harvard in November 2004, this book defines “active liberty” as the sharing of sovereign authority between the nation and its citizens. Breyer views the Constitution not as a rigid legal framework but as a living guide that adapts to a changing society. He emphasizes that the Constitution's true genius lies in its principles' ability to address contemporary issues rather than adhering to a static interpretation. Through examples in free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Breyer argues that courts should recognize the Constitution’s democratic nature when interpreting texts. He asserts that citizens must engage in community life to gain the experience needed for self-governance. Breyer's unique perspective in the federalism debate posits that deference to congressional power can enhance democratic participation. He contends that, despite its imperfections, Congress has effectively balanced diverse citizen views, especially during crises, better than the executive or judicial branches. With a nuanced understanding of complexity, Breyer advocates for Congress as the appropriate forum for resolving policy disputes, making a significant declaration about democracy and governance.



