Bookbot

The Secular Conscience

Why Belief Belongs in Public Life

Parametry

  • 269 stron
  • 10 godzin czytania

Więcej o książce

From Washington to the Vatican to Tehran, religion is increasingly a public concern, with secular values like individual autonomy, pluralism, and freedom of conscience under siege. The religious assert a monopoly on morality, while secular liberals are criticized for lacking a clear moral stance. Many secular liberals have abandoned their moral authority, viewing issues of conscience—religion, ethics, and values—as private matters unsuitable for public discourse. This mindset prevents them from critically examining religion's impact on individual rights and advocating their moral perspectives for fear of imposing beliefs on others. Philosopher Austin Dacey calls for a reevaluation of conscience's role in public life, drawing inspiration from earlier liberal thinkers like Spinoza and John Stuart Mill. He urges liberals to break their silence and champion a renewed secularism rooted in the objective moral value of conscience. Dacey likens conscience to the press, asserting that it must be protected from coercion and control, not due to its privacy but because of its essential public function. Conscience should precede all faiths, guiding belief and providing a common language for meaningful dialogue in a diverse society, serving as an ethical framework for global discussions.

Wydanie

W magazynie mamy łącznie książkiThe Secular Conscience(2008)

Zakup książki

The Secular Conscience, Austin Dacey

Język
Rok wydania
2008
Oprawa
(twarda),
Stan książki
Dobry
Cena
24,78 zł

Metody płatności

Nikt jeszcze nie ocenił.Oceń

Tytuł
The Secular Conscience
Podtytuł
Why Belief Belongs in Public Life
Język
angielski
Rok wydania
2008
Oprawa
twarda
Liczba stron
269
ISBN10
1591026040
ISBN13
9781591026044
Seria
Kategorie
Opis
From Washington to the Vatican to Tehran, religion is increasingly a public concern, with secular values like individual autonomy, pluralism, and freedom of conscience under siege. The religious assert a monopoly on morality, while secular liberals are criticized for lacking a clear moral stance. Many secular liberals have abandoned their moral authority, viewing issues of conscience—religion, ethics, and values—as private matters unsuitable for public discourse. This mindset prevents them from critically examining religion's impact on individual rights and advocating their moral perspectives for fear of imposing beliefs on others. Philosopher Austin Dacey calls for a reevaluation of conscience's role in public life, drawing inspiration from earlier liberal thinkers like Spinoza and John Stuart Mill. He urges liberals to break their silence and champion a renewed secularism rooted in the objective moral value of conscience. Dacey likens conscience to the press, asserting that it must be protected from coercion and control, not due to its privacy but because of its essential public function. Conscience should precede all faiths, guiding belief and providing a common language for meaningful dialogue in a diverse society, serving as an ethical framework for global discussions.